THE COMPLEMENTARY REGIME OF THE MILLENNIUM

You may ask yourself: Are these days dark? And the answer will always depend on whom you ask—because we live in society. Today’s theme is Society in a general sense. In our current era, a large number of States operate under democratic systems. Democracy, therefore, is the central pillar of many United Nations member states. However, democracy alone is not enough, as it contains gaps and flaws.

As a complement, I advocate for the Regime of the Millennium, which, as stated, is supplementary to Democracy. The structure of this complementary regime consists of blocs within each UN member state, focused on International Affairs. This means that Democracy cannot be abandoned, but rather must be enhanced. For this reason, the Complementary Regime of the Millennium is a clear trend for deepening dialogue within the Society of Progress. When we speak of the Complementary Regime, we refer to local bases in each capital city, with representatives from different sectors of society on a planetary scale.

In practice, the Complementary Regime brings discussions closer to the soil of a given State, enabling negotiations and transactions with another State. In other words, it is a bridge for dialogue, where the members of the regime are representatives from all countries. Yes! This is advancement and progress in diplomatic efforts, providing support for bilateral meetings between State representatives. This makes it more predictable and tangible to identify the main barriers that must be overcome for a more stable and foreseeable global market.

For example, if the core of the Millennial Regime—complementary to Democracy—is located in Brasília, the capital of Brazil, and includes participants from various nationalities (limited to one participant per seat, with appropriate advisory support, including consular and diplomatic figures), we would have the opportunity to see processes carried out more swiftly, while respecting all rights, laws, and constitutions of the host country.

I advocate for the Complementary Regime as a means to accelerate and sharpen the resolutions that must be made with agility, seeking both expected and unexpected answers within each core. In essence, it is a new form of dialogue, where representatives of each Complementary Regime core elect a Core President for a two-year term—or alternatively, the role may be assigned to the Native Millennial Participant.

This configuration allows the Complementary Regime not only to address international gaps in Democracy but also to respect the democratic systems it complements, while honoring the national sovereignty of the host member state. Imagine, in Brazil, in Brasília, a building filled with people from various nationalities discussing presented issues, where the State is expected to produce a report enabling more assertive action on the social challenges raised—this is the proposal of the Complementary Regime.

Connectivity, a thread we use more than ever before, is becoming increasingly vital. At the same time, Democracy reveals its gaps and flaws—most notably, the rise in global inequality. It’s like swimming in a school of hungry sharks, where the chances of survival are nearly zero. That’s the effect of connectivity—this is the reality we are living. In contrast, the Complementary Regime is what disperses the school and ensures you reach the shore to sip coconut water.

In conclusion, the structure of this Regime still needs to be developed, but what is certain is that this Complementary Regime will only serve to advance negotiations, improve dialogue, and safeguard the sovereignty of specific member states. There is no reason to deny its implementation—this is the present reality. We face serious crises in the future ahead, and the Complementary Regime is, without a doubt, our expert parachute to help us land safely and reconsider whether we want to jump from the plane again.